The Scientific Case Against Evolution
by Henry M. Morris, Ph.D.
First of all, the lack of a case for evolution is clear from the fact that no one has ever seen it happen. If it were a real process, evolution should still be occurring, and there should be many "transitional" forms that we could observe. What we see instead, of course, is an array of distinct "kinds" of plants and animals with many varieties within each kind, but with very clear and -- apparently -- unbridgeable gaps between the kinds.
That is, for example, there are many varieties of dogs and many varieties of cats, but no "dats" or "cogs." Such variation is often called microevolution, and these minor horizontal (or downward) changes occur fairly often, but such changes are not true "vertical" evolution. Continue Reading
It is easier to fool people into believing the evolution lie than to convince them that they have been fooled - especially the intelligent ones because they can be easily offended by common sense .
Showing posts with label Christopher Hittchins. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Christopher Hittchins. Show all posts
Saturday, September 21, 2019
Friday, August 16, 2019
Former Evolutionary Professor Dr Richard Lumsden
From Evolution to Creation: The Testimony of Dr. Richard Lumsden
November 19, 2009 (first published February 1, 2005) (David Cloud, Fundamental Baptist Information Service, P.O. Box 610368, Port Huron, MI 48061, 866-295-4143, fbns@wayoflife.org)
The following is excerpted from “The World’s Greatest Creation Scientists” by David Coppedge, which is available from Master Plan Association, http://www.creationsafaris.com/products.htm -- (See Dick Lumsden's testimony here: https://vimeo.com/11466124 )
Sure, there have been Christians who did good science, but that was before Darwin. Right? Wrong! Here is the story of a staunch Darwinian who converted to creationism first, then to Christianity.
You couldn’t claim Dick Lumsden’s (1938-97) faith come from the culture in which he lived, like you might with someone from the 1500s. If anything, he was a product of the anti-creationist second half of the twentieth century. Dr. Richard D. Lumsden was fully grounded in Darwinian philosophy, and had no reason or desire to consider Christianity. Science was his faith: the facts, and only the facts. But at the apex of his professional career, he had enough integrity to check out the facts, and made a difficult choice to go where the facts led him, against what he had been taught, and against what he himself taught. His life took a dramatic turnaround, from Darwinist to creationist, and from atheist to Christian. Continue reading HERE .
November 19, 2009 (first published February 1, 2005) (David Cloud, Fundamental Baptist Information Service, P.O. Box 610368, Port Huron, MI 48061, 866-295-4143, fbns@wayoflife.org)
The following is excerpted from “The World’s Greatest Creation Scientists” by David Coppedge, which is available from Master Plan Association, http://www.creationsafaris.com/products.htm -- (See Dick Lumsden's testimony here: https://vimeo.com/11466124 )
Sure, there have been Christians who did good science, but that was before Darwin. Right? Wrong! Here is the story of a staunch Darwinian who converted to creationism first, then to Christianity.
You couldn’t claim Dick Lumsden’s (1938-97) faith come from the culture in which he lived, like you might with someone from the 1500s. If anything, he was a product of the anti-creationist second half of the twentieth century. Dr. Richard D. Lumsden was fully grounded in Darwinian philosophy, and had no reason or desire to consider Christianity. Science was his faith: the facts, and only the facts. But at the apex of his professional career, he had enough integrity to check out the facts, and made a difficult choice to go where the facts led him, against what he had been taught, and against what he himself taught. His life took a dramatic turnaround, from Darwinist to creationist, and from atheist to Christian. Continue reading HERE .
Come Let Us Reason
Grand Metamorphosis: Yahweh God’s Signature
Darwin: “If it could be demonstrated that any complex organ existed, which could not possibly have been formed by numerous, successive, slight modifications, my theory would absolutely break down. But I can find no such case.”
The Monarch caterpillar has about 20 legs, chewing mouth parts, and NO reproductive organs, nothing even rudimentary. It cannot fly except between the tree limb and the ground before it hits.
Before its last molt, It hooks its hindmost legs to a branch, forms a hard chrysalis around itself, and powerful enzymes inside begin the process of dissolving the entire animal.
It then turns itself into soup.
Little buds of tissue, called imaginal buds, survive, floating in the soup that used to be the caterpillar. These little collections of tissue begin the process of generating an entirely new creature.
The brand new creature does not remotely resemble a caterpillar. It has six segmented legs, three separate body parts, head thorax, and abdomen, and is covered with tiny sensory hairs.
It obtains its nutrition from a proboscis, a long tube for sucking nectar, no trace of chewing mouth parts. It also has a gloriously beautiful set of fully functional wings after it pumps fluid into them from its abdomen.
It can fly.
Suppose you have a child which reaches puberty and then a radical mutation or mutations causes it to turn itself into soup.What would be the next mutation?You see there WOULDN’T BE a next mutation. That's it. You’re dead.
But what if just his/her head turns into soup? Still dead. Say just his/her legs? Still, death is inevitable. You get the idea. Nothing works unless everything works. The whole process has to be pre-programmed into the DNA of the tiny egg where it all began or there is no path between the two totally different creatures that any evolutionary process could survive.
Darwin: “If it could be demonstrated that any complex organ existed, which could not possibly have been formed by numerous, successive, slight modifications, my theory would absolutely break down. But I can find no such case.”
The Monarch caterpillar has about 20 legs, chewing mouth parts, and NO reproductive organs, nothing even rudimentary. It cannot fly except between the tree limb and the ground before it hits.
Before its last molt, It hooks its hindmost legs to a branch, forms a hard chrysalis around itself, and powerful enzymes inside begin the process of dissolving the entire animal.
It then turns itself into soup.
Little buds of tissue, called imaginal buds, survive, floating in the soup that used to be the caterpillar. These little collections of tissue begin the process of generating an entirely new creature.
The brand new creature does not remotely resemble a caterpillar. It has six segmented legs, three separate body parts, head thorax, and abdomen, and is covered with tiny sensory hairs.
It obtains its nutrition from a proboscis, a long tube for sucking nectar, no trace of chewing mouth parts. It also has a gloriously beautiful set of fully functional wings after it pumps fluid into them from its abdomen.
It can fly.
Suppose you have a child which reaches puberty and then a radical mutation or mutations causes it to turn itself into soup.What would be the next mutation?You see there WOULDN’T BE a next mutation. That's it. You’re dead.
But what if just his/her head turns into soup? Still dead. Say just his/her legs? Still, death is inevitable. You get the idea. Nothing works unless everything works. The whole process has to be pre-programmed into the DNA of the tiny egg where it all began or there is no path between the two totally different creatures that any evolutionary process could survive.
Yahweh God's signature, written in glorious living color, on the butterfly’s wings.


