Showing posts with label Neil Grasse. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Neil Grasse. Show all posts

Saturday, September 21, 2019

The Scientific Case Against Evolution

The Scientific Case Against Evolution
by Henry M. Morris, Ph.D.

First of all, the lack of a case for evolution is clear from the fact that no one has ever seen it happen. If it were a real process, evolution should still be occurring, and there should be many "transitional" forms that we could observe. What we see instead, of course, is an array of distinct "kinds" of plants and animals with many varieties within each kind, but with very clear and -- apparently -- unbridgeable gaps between the kinds.

That is, for example, there are many varieties of dogs and many varieties of cats, but no "dats" or "cogs." Such variation is often called microevolution, and these minor horizontal (or downward) changes occur fairly often, but such changes are not true "vertical" evolution. Continue Reading 

Evolution Cleverly Disguised As Science



the origin of fake news,
Evolution Cleverly Disguised As Science

As a matter of practice, a fraud is much more likely to succeed if it appears to be validated by an authority. In general, one does not expect a professional in a field to concoct a hoax. Experience teaches that this expectation is not always met. We have all seen the iconic image like the one above and simply assumedthat there is solid scientific evidence to support it by eminent scientists.

We assumed there existed full and complete skeletons that anthropologists, paleontologists, etc had used to create the sketches that they presented to the world as fact. This is not the case. Genuine science is objective and invites scrutiny and investigation. It does not ridicule the critics of its conclusions, but instead silences their criticisms by setting forth the evidence from which those conclusions are drawn.

Genuine science seeks the truth that explains the observed evidence. It does not prejudice the investigation by ruling out, from the start, hypotheses that may very well provide the best explanation for the observed evidence.   Genuine science rejects any hypothesis that consistently fails to fit observed scientific evidence. It does not persistently assume that the fault lies in the evidence rather than in the hypothesis itself.

On all three counts, the commonly-accepted "Theory of Evolution" fails the test of being scientific.(by Mitch Cervinka, M.A. Mathematics)

Friday, September 20, 2019

For thou art monkey, and unto monkey thou shalt return


for thou art monkey and unto monkey thou shall return
For thou art monkey, and unto monkey thou shalt return..

According to evolution, today's plant and animal species are all merely transitional forms, part of an endless chain of life whose links are gradually evolving into more advanced stages. For this reason Darwin regarded the classification "species" as "a mere useless abstraction" and "as one arbitrarily given for the sake of convenience."

This is in direct contradiction to Yahweh God's Word which states that all living creatures were created "after their kind" with the ability to bring forth seed, or fruit, "after their Kind." (Gen. 1) Now this word "kind" is the old King James translation of the Hebrew word "min", which today's scholars have translated to mean "species" So today's living creatures are not the result of some sort of transmutation of species, but definite set species! Not natural selection, but Yahweh God's selection! Not evolutionary adaptations, but Yahweh God's Creations!

We never heard yet or they never proved yet that any dog ever became a cat or a cat a dog! There are all kinds of dogs and all kinds of cats, but there are no dog-cats or no cat-dogs! Because Yahweh God created everything "after its own kind" and they can't possibly get out of that kind. They may vary within their kind or specie, but they'll never change into another! It's impossible!

These facts even disturbed Darwin, who questioned, "Why, if species have descended from the other species by fine gradation, do we not everywhere see innumerable transitional forms? Why is not all nature in confusion, instead of the species being, as we see them, well defined?" The answer to Charles' question is simple! All he had to do was read Genesis Chapter One and he could have known that species have not descended from other species, but were created by Yahweh God in orderly, set "kinds"--and that's why all nature is not in confusion!  Continue Reading 

Atheists claim to be logical but they are actually blindly emotional

origin of species, richard dawkins, the god delusion, the missing link
There is iron on Mars, and probably on some other planets. But you cannot make steel from iron without fire and you cannot have fire on Mars, or other planets. Here is why:

Did you know that our Earth’s atmosphere is absolutely perfect for having STABLE FIRES? Fire needs oxygen to burn and if our atmosphere had just one percentage less oxygen, fire would not burn and humankind would not have been able to make fires. But also, if our atmosphere had just one percentage more oxygen, fires would burn out of control.

The Earth’s atmosphere is perfect for us in every way. All of this is just a part of the many gifts from our Creator God (Yahweh)  we take for granted. So let’s all admit it: If Earth did not have most of the above Divine Gifts, man would have perished from the Earth long ago.

Of course atheists would think that all of this is nonsense, mainly because atheists have an emotional attachment in this type of debate because they hate the very thought that there is a power higher than themselves. Atheists claim to be logical but they are actually blindly emotional whenever it comes to the presence of our Creator God (Yahweh). But we suggest we should all look at this logically. Logically speaking, there are just two possibilities. Either the Divine Gifts are provided by Creator God (Yahweh), or the gifts came here by CHANCE. Is there any evidence that Mother Earth’s Divine Gifts came about by chance? Let’s go down that line of reasoning and see where it leads us. Continue Reading

The absence of transitional forms is an insurmountable hurdle for evolutionists

charles darwin, evolution, the theory of evolution, the god delusion, the missing links
In 1859, in his book Origin of the Species, Charles Darwin wrote: “Why, if species have descended from other species by insensibly fine gradations, (why) do we not everywhere see innumerable transitional forms?”. This is from chapter six entitled Difficulties on the Theory.

Scientists who believe in the evolution theory  have been searching for transitional forms ever since but none  have been found because they dont exist ! Many scientists have fraudulently deceived the world by planting or reconstructing fossils which they would claim to be authentic finds.

All of them have since been exposed to be frauds. One of the  most widely published evolution fraud was committed in the UK where a skull presumably belonging to a missing link was presented to the world by Biologists, Scientists & Paleontologists. It was one of the greatest scientific hoax ever.  ( The Smithsonian )

If this big, fabricated work of fiction called evolution were true, then there should be numerous missing links dug up! If there were billions of years of evolution, we'd be up to our ears in missing links!  Scientists who believe in evolution have been searching for transitional forms ever since but NONE  have been not found.  More than 100 over years after Darwin, literally hundreds of millions of fossils have been extracted from all fossil-bearing rock strata and none of them are in "transitional forms" or missing links - they all obviously belong to a definite species! In fact, it is estimated that over 100,000 different, distinct species of fossils have been found with not a single skeleton of the 'missing link'!

Tuesday, August 27, 2019

Chirality totally destroys the claim that life came from chemicals.


Chirality totally destroys the claim that life came from chemicals.

Evolution can only give you a theory that might on the surface seem possible . But when true science gets involved & scientists start asking questions, the problems and false logic of this theory becomes apparent. This is why evolution hopes THAT YOU DONT KNOW REAL CHEMISTRY. The fact that chirality was missing in those amino acids ( in the experiment in this video ) is not just a problem to be debated, it points to a catastrophic failure that “life” cannot come from chemicals by natural processes. In other words, the theory of evolution is a CATASTROPHIC FAILURE !





Friday, August 16, 2019

The Greatest Scientific Hoax - The Piltdown Man.

the missing link
The 1953 meeting in which Geological Society revealed
the Piltdown Man to be a hoax
The Greatest Scientific Hoax 

The Piltdown Man was a paleoanthropological hoax in which bone fragments were presented as the fossilised remains of a previously unknown early human. These fragments consisted of parts of a skull and jawbone collected in 1912 from a gravel pit at Piltdown, East Sussex, England.

 This skull, which was originally “found” by collector Charles Dawson, fooled most of the world’s paleontologists into believing it represented a key missing link on the ape-human evolutionary chain. The hoax survived for 40 years before finally being revealed as a fraud in 1953. In fact, the skull turned out to be nothing more than a modern human cranium attached to the jawbone of an orang-utan.   Continue reading 

Former Evolutionary Professor Dr Richard Lumsden

From Evolution to Creation: The Testimony of Dr. Richard Lumsden

November 19, 2009 (first published February 1, 2005) (David Cloud, Fundamental Baptist Information Service, P.O. Box 610368, Port Huron, MI 48061, 866-295-4143, fbns@wayoflife.org)

The following is excerpted from “The World’s Greatest Creation Scientists” by David Coppedge, which is available from Master Plan Association, http://www.creationsafaris.com/products.htm -- (See Dick Lumsden's testimony here: https://vimeo.com/11466124 )

Sure, there have been Christians who did good science, but that was before Darwin. Right? Wrong! Here is the story of a staunch Darwinian who converted to creationism first, then to Christianity.

You couldn’t claim Dick Lumsden’s (1938-97) faith come from the culture in which he lived, like you might with someone from the 1500s. If anything, he was a product of the anti-creationist second half of the twentieth century. Dr. Richard D. Lumsden was fully grounded in Darwinian philosophy, and had no reason or desire to consider Christianity. Science was his faith: the facts, and only the facts. But at the apex of his professional career, he had enough integrity to check out the facts, and made a difficult choice to go where the facts led him, against what he had been taught, and against what he himself taught. His life took a dramatic turnaround, from Darwinist to creationist, and from atheist to Christian.  Continue reading HERE .

Come Let Us Reason

Grand Metamorphosis: Yahweh God’s Signature

debunking evolution, evolution is not science ,
Darwin: “If it could be demonstrated that any complex organ existed, which could not possibly have been formed by numerous, successive, slight modifications, my theory would absolutely break down. But I can find no such case.”

The Monarch caterpillar has about 20 legs, chewing mouth parts, and NO reproductive organs, nothing even rudimentary. It cannot fly except between the tree limb and the ground before it hits.
Before its last molt, It hooks its hindmost legs to a branch, forms a hard chrysalis around itself, and powerful enzymes inside begin the process of dissolving the entire animal.

It then turns itself into soup.

Little buds of tissue, called imaginal buds, survive, floating in the soup that used to be the caterpillar. These little collections of tissue begin the process of generating an entirely new creature.
The brand new creature does not remotely resemble a caterpillar. It has six segmented legs, three separate body parts, head thorax, and abdomen, and is covered with tiny sensory hairs.
It obtains its nutrition from a proboscis, a long tube for sucking nectar, no trace of chewing mouth parts. It also has a gloriously beautiful set of fully functional wings after it pumps fluid into them from its abdomen.

It can fly.

Suppose you have a child which reaches puberty and then a radical mutation or mutations causes it to turn itself into soup.What would be the next mutation?You see there WOULDN’T BE a next mutation. 
That's it. You’re dead.

But what if just his/her head turns into soup? Still dead. Say just his/her legs? Still, death is inevitable. You get the idea. Nothing works unless everything works. The whole process has to be pre-programmed into the DNA of the tiny egg where it all began or there is no path between the two totally different creatures that any evolutionary process could survive.

Yahweh God's signature, written in glorious living color, on the butterfly’s wings.