The Scientific Case Against Evolution

The Scientific Case Against Evolution
by Henry M. Morris, Ph.D.

First of all, the lack of a case for evolution is clear from the fact that no one has ever seen it happen. If it were a real process, evolution should still be occurring, and there should be many "transitional" forms that we could observe. What we see instead, of course, is an array of distinct "kinds" of plants and animals with many varieties within each kind, but with very clear and -- apparently -- unbridgeable gaps between the kinds.

That is, for example, there are many varieties of dogs and many varieties of cats, but no "dats" or "cogs." Such variation is often called microevolution, and these minor horizontal (or downward) changes occur fairly often, but such changes are not true "vertical" evolution. Continue Reading 

The Greatest Scientific Hoax - The Piltdown Man.

The 1953 meeting in which Geological Society revealed
the Piltdown Man to be a hoax

The Greatest Scientific Hoax 

The Piltdown Man was a paleoanthropological hoax in which bone fragments were presented as the fossilised remains of a previously unknown early human. These fragments consisted of parts of a skull and jawbone collected in 1912 from a gravel pit at Piltdown, East Sussex, England.

 This skull, which was originally “found” by collector Charles Dawson, fooled most of the world’s paleontologists into believing it represented a key missing link on the ape-human evolutionary chain. The hoax survived for 40 years before finally being revealed as a fraud in 1953. In fact, the skull turned out to be nothing more than a modern human cranium attached to the jawbone of an orang-utan.   Continue reading 

Come Let Us Reason

Grand Metamorphosis: Yahweh God’s Signature

Darwin: “If it could be demonstrated that any complex organ existed, which could not possibly have been formed by numerous, successive, slight modifications, my theory would absolutely break down. But I can find no such case.”

The Monarch caterpillar has about 20 legs, chewing mouth parts, and NO reproductive organs, nothing even rudimentary. It cannot fly except between the tree limb and the ground before it hits.
Before its last molt, It hooks its hindmost legs to a branch, forms a hard chrysalis around itself, and powerful enzymes inside begin the process of dissolving the entire animal.

It then turns itself into soup.

Little buds of tissue, called imaginal buds, survive, floating in the soup that used to be the caterpillar. These little collections of tissue begin the process of generating an entirely new creature.
The brand new creature does not remotely resemble a caterpillar. It has six segmented legs, three separate body parts, head thorax, and abdomen, and is covered with tiny sensory hairs.
It obtains its nutrition from a proboscis, a long tube for sucking nectar, no trace of chewing mouth parts. It also has a gloriously beautiful set of fully functional wings after it pumps fluid into them from its abdomen.

It can fly.

Suppose you have a child which reaches puberty and then a radical mutation or mutations causes it to turn itself into soup.What would be the next mutation?You see there WOULDN’T BE a next mutation. 
That's it. You’re dead.

But what if just his/her head turns into soup? Still dead. Say just his/her legs? Still, death is inevitable. You get the idea. Nothing works unless everything works. The whole process has to be pre-programmed into the DNA of the tiny egg where it all began or there is no path between the two totally different creatures that any evolutionary process could survive.

Yahweh God's signature, written in glorious living color, on the butterfly’s wings.